| | Good morning, Nvidia earnings land today, and Wall Streetās acting like itās the Super Bowl, the Met Gala, and Judgment Day all rolled into one. With $4.4 trillion in market cap riding shotgun, the AI kingās numbers could make or break a stock market thatās largely been clinging to AI hype. Meanwhile, Trump is threatening legal war with Fed governor Lisa Cook and exploring ways to gain more power over the 12 regional Fed banks. Economists warn this could backfire in a big way. Elsewhere, Bidenās EV tax credit is about to expire, but thereās last-minute wiggle room for buyers rushing to lock in savings, which could unexpectedly pull forward demand and earnings for automakers. And American companies are dusting off their 2018 playbooks to front-load Chinese imports ahead of Trumpās next tariff announcement. Itās shaping up to be a high-stakes, high-volatility, high-drama day. | | | | | Hang tight, Dan Runkevicius, Chief Editor | | | | | | | āFirst of all, technicals on equities are crazy, the amount of cash on the sidelines, the amount of buybacks relative to the IPO calendar, i.e., the demand versus supply, is pretty extraordinary. ⦠I looked at 2024 ā if you strip out Tesla for obvious reasons ā Mag 7 year-on-year growth is like 54%. ⦠Then you take the other side of it, you have a fixed income. I think the Fed can cut rates, but until then you got yield levels, you can create portfolio 6.5% to 7% yield. Thatās pretty good. I would throw out [one] last thing ⦠[thereās] low volatility to own equities ā so you donāt actually have to take the downside risk. Thatās a pretty good environment.ā ā BlackRock chief investment officer Rick Rieder | | | | | Five things to know before opening bell | |
š„ Trump vs. the Fed The Trump administration is looking for ways to have more sway over regional Fed banks, according to people familiar with the matter, as first reported by Bloomberg. President Trump has already moved to oust Governor Lisa Cook and says heās prepared for a legal fight. š EV buyers get wiggle room Bidenās $7,500 EV tax credit (or $4,000 for used vehicles) will expire on September 30, but the IRS just changed the rulebook. Buyers can now qualify based on the contract signing date, not the delivery date. That gives shoppers more flexibility, especially if the car needs to be shipped or hasnāt been built yet. š¾ Nvidia earnings front and center today Nvidia reports earnings after the bell and the stakes couldnāt be higher. With a $4.4 trillion market cap and nearly 8% weight in the S&P 500, todayās Q2 results could make or break the AI rally. Analysts expect a bigger post-earnings move than any other quarter this past year. The S&P 500 is projected to swing about 0.9% in response. āThere is one chip in the world fueling the AI Revolution, and that is Nvidia,ā said Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives. š¬ Consumer confidence slips again The Conference Boardās consumer confidence index dropped from 98.7 in July to 97.4 in August. Although relatively mild, the dip isnāt encouraging. The āpresent situationā gauge ā which tracks perceptions of current jobs and business conditions ā fell 1.6 points. Expectations for labor and income over the next six months dropped 1.2 points. The data reinforces early warning sings showing up in credit card delinquency and retail foot traffic. š§Æ Treasuries arenāt buying the rate-cut hype Stocks rallied after Powellās remarks last week, but the bond market isnāt celebrating. 30-year Treasury yields climbed again yesterday as inflation fears creep back in. āIf the Fed cuts to make it cheaper for the government to borrow, theyāre essentially giving up the ability to raise rates again. And thatās how you get spiraling out-of-control inflation," warned Jim Bianco of Bianco Research. | | | | Trumpās shadow looms larger over the Fed
| | | | Citing alleged mortgage fraud, President Trump fired Fed governor Lisa Cook, reviving concerns about political interference at the central bank. For her part, Cook responded with a public rebuke. āPresident Trump purported to fire me āfor causeā when no cause exists under the law. I will not resign,ā she said. Speaking at a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, Trump said heād abide by any court decision but brushed off Cookās challenge. āOh sure, always,ā he said. āShe seems to have had an infraction, and she canāt have an infraction, especially that infraction, because sheās in charge of, if you think about it, mortgages.ā āļø Independence in question Trumpās persistent browbeating of Fed Chair Jerome Powell has already raised red flags about the Fedās independence. His campaign against Cook is now drawing even more scrutiny, especially as the White House eyes greater control over the regional Fed banks. āIf itās just 25 [basis points] to get Trump off their back, thatās not credible monetary policy,ā warned market strategist Jim Bianco warned Bianco added that while this particular incident may not influence next monthās FOMC decision, Trumpās power to appoint additional Fed governors could reshape the Boardās composition. āHe could potentially veto the reappointment of regional Fed presidents,ā Bianco said, turning the institution into a rubber stamp for his policy agenda. Deutsche Bankās Jim Reid shares Bianco's concern. āWith Stephen Miran nominated for the seat recently vacated by Governor Kugler ā and with Governors Waller and Bowman dissenting in favor of a rate cut at the July meeting ā this increases the prospects of a dovish majority on the Board,ā he said. š Market reaction So far, stocks have shrugged off the Fed drama, while gold has crept toward near-record highs. But it may be only a matter of time before Trumpās war of words turns into direct action ā and that could shake up both the Fed and the broader market. āWe think the episode will add to growing global investor unease over Trumpās efforts to influence the independent central bank,ā said UBS global head of equities Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi.
| | | | š¦ Corporate America dusts off 2018 playbooks | | | | From factories to freight to retailers, businesses across the supply chain are scrambling to adapt to rising costs from Trumpās ever-shifting trade policy with China. Nearly five months after his initial Liberation Day tariff announcements, weāre finally seeing hard data on how companies are responding... and it looks a lot like 2018. š History repeating, just louder Back in Trumpās first term, the mere threat of tariffs on Chinese goods triggered a rush of front-loading, with U.S. importers racing to stockpile inventory ahead of new duties. That same playbook is now back in full force. According to ImportGenius, three distinct waves of front-loading have already hit in 2025, the most dramatic coming between June and July, when a brief tariff truce prompted a 49% surge in Chinese imports. Thatās more than double the sharpest spike seen during the 2018 rush, which topped out at 22%. š¤ Will it work this time? Short-term... maybe. Companies are clearly pulling every lever to soften the blow... and for now, those strategies have helped shield consumers from the worst of the recent price hikes. āMany businesses have been creative and savvy in using different means to buffer the initial shock,ā said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon. But longer-term, import volumes from China have already started to slump, and analysts say the trend may be just getting started. āThe difference in exports from China to the U.S. between July and August of this year is a 40% drop,ā warned ImportGenius analyst Lynn Hughes. āYes, the month isnāt over yet, but realistically, we still only have a week. Considering the amount of demand already pulled forward at the beginning of the year and the steady decline, I feel we could be about to start seeing imports drop below 600,000 containers for several months.ā šØ One more wrinkle The bigger problem is that nobody know what will happen next. Just this week, Trump floated the idea of slapping a 200% tariff on Chinese imports if Beijing restricts U.S.-bound shipments of rare-earth magnets. So while front-loading may buy companies a little time, it wonāt offer much predictability. And that ā as most CEOs will tell you ā is the real cost. | | | | š”ļø After the Intel deal, are Pentagon collabs next? | | | | President Trump isnāt done making corporate deals, especially ones where the federal government takes an ownership stake in corporate America.
Following Trumpās praise of the Intel deal, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett hinted that more moves are on the table. āThe president has made it clear all the way back to the campaign ā he thinks that in the end, it would be great if the U.S. could start to build up a sovereign wealth fund,ā Hassett said. āSo Iām sure that at some point there will be more transactions, if not in this industry then other industries.ā Less than 24 hours later, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick pointed to what could be next: defense.āOh, thereās a monstrous discussion about defense,ā he said. Lutnick revealed that Trump officials are weighing a plan to give the Pentagon a direct stake in defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, which he described as already ābasically an arm of the U.S. government.ā Lockheed didnāt confirm any such talks but issued a rather diplomatic statement. āAs we did in his first term, we are continuing our strong working relationship with President Trump and his Administration to strengthen our national defense.ā š§Ø A divisive approach While the Intel deal was touted as a win by the White House, the idea of more state-backed corporate partnerships isnāt exactly unifying the right. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) bluntly called the Intel investment a āterrible idea.ā āIf socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldnāt the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism?ā he said. The White House isnāt letting up, and talk of turning defense into a government co-op is getting harder to ignore. | | | | Rate this newsletter | | | Your feedback matters! Before you go, please rate this newsletter and share your thoughts. | | | | | | | | | | | | InvestorsObserver | | You received this email because you signed up on our website or made a purchase from us. | | | | |