| The Fed’s midweek decision to hold rates steady was no surprise. What has changed since then is how analysts are recalculating the odds of a cut. 🎙️ Powell sets the tone Shortly after the announcement, Fed chair Jerome Powell shot down expectations that a September cut was already in the bag. “We have made no decisions about September,” Powell said. “We don’t do that in advance.” That was enough to drag the CME FedWatch tool’s odds of a September cut from 65% to 45%. Elyse Ausenbaugh, head of investment strategy at JP Morgan Wealth Management, agrees with Powell, saying the Fed's approach made sense. “The expectation for this meeting wasn’t a rate cut, and I don’t think there would have been much upside to Powell signaling that one was imminent,” she said. “The data, as it stands today, isn’t yet calling for one, and a lot could change between now and the FOMC’s next decision point in September.” ⚖️ A tough balancing act With GDP growth coming in hotter than expected, inflation still running above target, and unemployment expected to tick higher in today’s report, the Fed’s balancing act is getting trickier. Holding rates higher is meant to cool borrowing and demand, but price hikes keep drifting away from the 2% target, while the labor market shows signs of softening.
President Donald Trump hasn’t let up in his campaign for cuts, and economists are increasingly siding with him. Two FOMC members even voted against holding rates steady. John Velis, strategist at BNY, expects the Fed will have to act eventually. “They’ll have to cut [rates] before the end of the year,” Velis said, predicting “the economy will have weakened by then and they’ll have clarity on the price impact of tariffs.” He sees a “low probability” of a September cut and says December looks more likely. Jill Gateman, co-head of US commercial banking at TD Bank, was more blunt. “It almost feels like they’re not going to make a decision until [Powell] can say there’s no uncertainty in the economy,” Gateman said. With uncertainty now “the new constant,” she argued the Fed shouldn’t keep dragging its feet. “There’s just too many moving parts to think that we’re going to wait uncertainty away before a decision can be rendered,” Gateman added. |