Justia - November 13, 2025

Kathryn Robb - Dear King Charles, Would You Talk to Our Leaders? - Nov 13, 2025

Child protection advocate Kathryn Robb urges King Charles III...

Click here to view in your browser if you are having trouble viewing this email.
Verdict - Legal Analysis and commentary from Justia.

Dear King Charles, Would You Talk to Our Leaders?

Kathryn Robb Nov 13, 2025
When a king shows moral courage, it exposes the cowardice of many.
Your Majesty,
Across the world, millions of children are being sexually assaulted, and most are also being silenced. Survivors are still being ignored and disbelieved. And leaders—the very people entrusted with the power to protect—are still choosing power, privilege, and political convenience over truth. This is a problem we can no longer afford to ignore.
I write to you not because I believe Britain’s monarch should wade into politics, but because you have long stood as a moral compass—a voice for morality, stewardship, and duty. You have spoken of the sacredness of nature, of the environment as our shared inheritance. Today, I ask you to extend that same moral clarity to another endangered realm: the safety and dignity of our children.
Your decision to strip your brother Andrew of his royal titles and military roles—despite the personal pain it must have caused—was a moment of rare, principled leadership. You did what so many in positions of power will not: you placed principle above privilege, and accountability above family loyalty. In doing so, you modeled the difficult but necessary truth that no one, not even those closest to us, can be exempt from responsibility when it comes to the exploitation of children. That is what leadership looks like.
For decades, the sexual abuse of children has been hidden behind the walls of institutions, the sanctuaries of churches, the gates of private estates, and now—the encrypted vaults of court files and congressional maneuvering. The Epstein files—still sealed and hidden from public view represent more than a scandal. They are a mirror held up to our collective cowardice. What does it say about our country when the truth can be purchased, protected, or postponed indefinitely?
Survivors look to our leaders, and they avert their eyes.  They turn to our institutions, and they protect their reputations instead of our children.
And in the United States, the cover-up continues to this day, often in plain sight. Speaker Mike Johnson’s refusal to swear in Arizona’s newly elected Representative Adelita Grijalva—duly chosen by the citizens of Arizona, and ready to serve—is more than a partisan maneuver. It is an act of obstruction that delays justice, truth, and accountability. It denies voters their rightful voice in Congress and signals, once again, that protecting political power takes precedence over protecting children. When those who lead the People’s House use silence as a shield, it echoes the same moral failure survivors have faced for generations.
Moreover, the world is watching—and the commentary speaks volumes. Recently, when President Donald Trump was asked about your decision to strip your brother Andrew of his titles, he said: “I feel very badly. It’s a terrible thing that’s happened to the family. That’s been a tragic situation. It’s too bad. I feel badly for the family.” Those words reflect a global instinct to sympathize with power rather than with those who have been harmed by it. Yet Your Majesty, you chose a harder path—one that honors truth over comfort, duty over denial, and justice over family loyalty. That act of integrity reveals what real leadership looks like, and why the world needs more of it.
In America, accountability has also been clouded by troubling optics. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, met with Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before Maxwell was transferred from Florida prison to the Federal Prison Camp in Texas, a cushier campus-like, lower-security facility. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for the sex trafficking of teenage girls. No one has publicly explained why that meeting occurred or how that transfer was approved so swiftly. For survivors, this clandestine meeting and favor raise serious concerns. Recent news has surfaced that Maxwell is receiving preferential treatment in her cozier digs and that she is seeking commutation. Once again, those in power bend the system, and the privileged receive special treatment. The appearance of cover-up is blindingly evident; it is all, as the British say, a bit dodgy. After all she must be giving something to get something. As Trump weighs a possible commutation for Ghislaine Maxwell, newly released House Oversight emails reveal Epstein’s chilling remark about “the dog that hasn’t barked”—suggesting that Trump himself, long within Epstein’s circle, remains the one name conspicuously absent.
Transparency must never be contingent upon relationships or political alliances. It is a fundamental principle of any legitimate justice system. Representative Jamie Raskin exemplifies the integrity our nation deserves, courageously confronting corruption and seeking to unveil the “give and take” of any deals between this convicted sex offender and the White House.
So I turn to you, Your Majesty—not as a king, but as a father, a grandfather, and a moral voice heard across the Commonwealth. The United States and nations around the world need moral leadership that transcends politics, privilege, and power. You have the power and moral clarity to remind our government that protecting children is not optional. Transparency is not a threat to justice—it is the foundation of it.
The files must be released. The truth must be told. Survivors deserve not only justice, but the dignity of acknowledgment. Transparency is not just a demand, it’s a necessity. Your late mother once said, “Grief is the price we pay for love.” Perhaps now we must say: Silence is the price we’ve paid for power. And at great cost to our children.
Please, Your Majesty—pick up the phone, give a ring to the political leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives and the man who covets your crown in the White House. Remind them of what duty and integrity truly mean. History will remember, fondly, those who chose courage over comfort, and infamously, those who did not.
Yours Respectfully,
An American, on behalf of children everywhere.
By Kathryn Robb, Esq.
Kathryn Robb is National Director of the Children’s Justice Campaign at ENOUGH ABUSE®.
#781-856-7207
[email protected]
Kathryn Robb, National Director of the Children’s Justice Campaign at Enough Abuse, is a lawyer, legislative advocate, and law instructor who has been fighting to pass meaningful child sex abuse legislation for over two decades in over thirty jurisdictions.
RECENT ARTICLES
The Turkey Sandwich Hurler’s Acquittal and the Chicken Rescuer’s Conviction Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf discusses the contrasting legal outcomes of Sean Dunn, who was acquitted for throwing a turkey sandwich at a federal agent in protest of government actions, and Zoe Rosenberg, who was convicted for rescuing chickens from a slaughterhouse as an act of animal rights activism. Professor Dorf argues that Dunn’s acquittal reflects juror sympathies with political protest against authority, while Rosenberg’s conviction exposes society’s deep normalization of animal agriculture and the judicial system’s resistance to acknowledging nonviolent civil disobedience that challenges that norm.... Read More
How Can We Educate a Generation of Students Who Have Come of Age in An Era of War and Celebration of Violence? Amherst professor Austin Sarat explores how the pervasive presence of war, violence, and graphic content—especially through social media—has shaped the mental health and worldview of the current generation of college students. Professor Sarat argues that educators must acknowledge these traumatic influences and develop strategies to help young people navigate a world filled with conflict, despair, and cynicism in order to cultivate resilience, critical thinking, and hope.... Read More
The Supreme Court’s Grant of a Stay in the Passport Gender Case, Trump v. Orr, Illustrates Recurring, and Suboptimal, Features of the Interim-Relief Docket UC Davis Law professor Vikram David Amar analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Orr, which granted the federal government a stay to allow the use of birth-assigned sex on passports during ongoing litigation, and critiques the broader procedural and substantive patterns the Court exhibits in such interim-relief (“shadow docket”) cases. Professor Amar argues that while the Court majority should provide fuller explanations even in emergency rulings, the liberal dissenters are strategically and analytically misguided in avoiding arguments about the constitutional merits, which are increasingly central to determining outcomes in these cases.... Read More
Forward this email.
Have friends who like law? Forward this email.
Like Verdict on Facebook
Like Verdict
for legal discussions on Facebook.
Follow @verdictjustia on Twitter
Follow @verdictjustia
for news and updates on Twitter.
Justia Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Unsubscribe From This Newsletter

or unsubscribe from all Justia newsletters immediately here.



You received this email because you have subscribed to the Verdict News E-Mail Feed.


If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at [email protected].


Justia | 1380 Pear Ave, Suite 2B, Mountain View, CA 94043