Justia - December 23, 2025

Kathryn Robb - What Does Christmas Ask of Americans? On character, cruelty, and the messages we pass to our children - Dec 23, 2025

Child protection advocate Kathryn Robb reflects on the moral...

Click here to view in your browser if you are having trouble viewing this email.
Verdict - Legal Analysis and commentary from Justia.

What Does Christmas Ask of Americans? On character, cruelty, and the messages we pass to our children

Kathryn Robb Dec 23, 2025
Every December, American Christians reach for familiar words. Light. Joy. Hope. Peace. We speak of Christmas as if it were a shared moral inheritance—something that connects us across differences of belief and politics. Even those who are not particularly religious or who do not attend church seem to sense that this season carries a certain moral significance through the birth and teachings of Jesus.
Christmas, taken seriously, is not nostalgic. It is demanding. It proposes a way of seeing the world and others that runs counter to many of our current patterns. If we truly believe, it demands that we be better.
It demands that we not grow comfortable with a system that withholds care from the sick. We have learned to speak about healthcare in a lexicon of technical economic terms – cost, price controls, and coverage, while quietly losing sight of the real people, often very sick people, many of whom are children, at the center of those equations. Christ’s ministry was rooted in healing; the only qualification was being a child of God. A society that celebrates His birth while steadily narrowing access to care should at least notice the moral tension between the two.
It demands that we not become numb to the suffering of migrants. The Christmas story begins with displacement: a family navigating political power, uncertainty, and danger. And yet we now accept, almost casually, images of children sleeping in detention facilities or families separated by policy. The inhumanity of ICE –  children without parents and parents without rights – has abandoned Christ’s command to protect the vulnerable. Whatever one believes about borders and enforcement, indifference is not a Christian virtue. Moral traditions do not collapse all at once; they erode when compassion becomes optional.
Christmas also demands that we not mistake cruelty for strength. Over time, the tone of public life shapes the inner principles of a society. When national leaders routinely demean, mock, and belittle—when the attack on a Congresswoman’s husband is met without genuine concern or sympathy; when a disabled reporter is physically mocked; when immigrants are described as “animals”; when women in the press are humiliated with language meant to silence; when a reporter’s question is dismissed with words like “Quiet, piggy”—something bigger than politics is unfolding.
Add to this the indecent framing by our president of a recent personal tragedy, when Rob Reiner and his wife were found murdered, remarks that sought to turn tragedy into political grievance, and a pattern comes into view. Respect is extended selectively. Compassion is rationed. Decency is lost.
Words matter not only because they offend, but because they form and teach character. What is repeated becomes acceptable. What is acceptable becomes normalized. Yet, Christmas points us in another direction — toward humility, toward compassion, toward restraint, toward the belief that dignity is not something to be earned or defended, but something to be honored.
And Christmas does not ask for adherence to political associations. In recent years, Christianity has become entangled with political identity in ways that weaken its moral muscle. Faith is sometimes used less as a call of self-reflection and more as a marker of tribal belonging, sharpening an “us vs. them” dichotomy. When religious language is deployed to approve grievance or excuse contempt, it loses its capacity to challenge us to be better. Christ was a revolutionary; he did not build a movement oriented around dominance or power. He formed a community grounded in service to all.
The celebration of the birth of Christ calls us to awaken to the humanity in all of us. “I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord.” Luke 2:10-11. The Christmas lights, trees, gifts, and other traditions remind us that love, compassion, and “great joy” are for all people.
I am not a theologian or a politician. I am an ordinary American who believes, however imperfectly, in the great teachings of Christ. I am especially cognizant of those teachings at this time of year, when we mark and celebrate His birth. Yet, when I listen to our public discourse, and when I watch cruelty be mistaken for confidence and contempt for candor, I feel a deep unease. Not because politics is exhausting—that is a given—but because something better seems to be slipping away: grace.
As a mother and grandmother, I am aware that children are always watching and absorbing far more than we think. They absorb not only what is said, but what is unsaid; not only what is forbidden, but what is tolerated; not only what is condemned, but what is excused. They learn from what adults laugh at, from what passes without comment, from what is ignored in the name of political loyalty or emotional comfort. When cruelty is modeled from positions of power and met with silence, or worse, with applause, it teaches a lesson no American civics course can undo. It teaches that empathy is optional and that dignity is conditional.
And having spent much of my professional life working in child protection law, I have come to understand that the law, for all its importance, has limits—especially when the habits of character it relies upon begin to erode. When that foundation of basic morality and humanity erodes, the protections we count on—especially for children—become far more fragile.
Christmas does not require that we agree with one another. It does not ask for certainty or perfection. But it does demand a specific posture toward the world: humility over dominance, compassion over ease, truth over performative politics.
The question the holiday season places before us is not whether we cite Christ’s name, in greetings, gift labels, and decorations, but whether we are willing to live, at least a little closer, to the spirit of His teachings.
For many of us, that question lingers long after the lights and decorations come down.
Kathryn Robb
Kathryn Robb, National Director of the Children’s Justice Campaign at Enough Abuse, is a lawyer, legislative advocate, and law instructor who has been fighting to pass meaningful child sex abuse legislation for over two decades in over thirty jurisdictions.
RECENT ARTICLES
What’s Wrong with Trump’s Plan to Send Tariff Rebate Checks Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf critiques President Trump's proposal to issue rebate checks funded by tariff revenue, focusing on its legality, economic impact, and policy implications. Professor Dorf argues that while such payments could be legal if authorized by Congress, the plan is economically unsound and politically harmful because it risks increasing inflation, adds to the deficit, and reinforces damaging tariff policies.... Read More
Why the Epstein Cover-up Will Fail University of Pennsylvania professor Marci A. Hamilton discusses the anticipated release of the Jeffrey Epstein files under the Epstein Transparency Act and the Trump administration’s expected efforts to limit disclosure, set against the broader context of society’s evolving response to child sex abuse cover-ups. Professor Hamilton argues that despite attempts to suppress the truth, a powerful cultural shift toward justice for survivors and public demand for accountability will ultimately defeat the efforts to protect powerful abusers and enablers.... Read More
Congress, Not the King: Why the Legislative Branch Controls Agency Tenure University of Kentucky, Rosenberg College of Law professor emeritus Alvin Goldman examines the constitutional authority over the tenure and independence of federal administrative agency officials, arguing that it lies with Congress rather than the President, despite modern claims rooted in the unitary executive theory. Professor Goldman argues that the Constitution’s text, structure, and underlying principles support congressional control to prevent presidential overreach, and warns that a Supreme Court shift in favor of increased executive power could endanger the legitimacy and stability of the administrative state.... Read More
Forward this email.
Have friends who like law? Forward this email.
Like Verdict on Facebook
Like Verdict
for legal discussions on Facebook.
Follow @verdictjustia on Twitter
Follow @verdictjustia
for news and updates on Twitter.
Justia Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Unsubscribe From This Newsletter

or unsubscribe from all Justia newsletters immediately here.



You received this email because you have subscribed to the Verdict News E-Mail Feed.


If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at [email protected].


Justia | 1380 Pear Ave, Suite 2B, Mountain View, CA 94043