Michael Burry, the investor of “The Big Short” fame, thinks there’s not enough appreciation for depreciation, and this week posted about his qualms about how the likes of Oracle and Meta are handling the accounting on their GPUs. In short, he says they are understating depreciation by extending the useful life of the chips they’re buying, and this artificially boosts earnings. |
- The estimated “useful life” of AI servers for the publicly traded hyperscalers is about five to six years. Their useful economic life — how long they’re actually being used to help make money — may be longer or shorter than that.
- Companies that spend hundreds of billions to invest in data centers don’t count that money as an expense immediately, but rather record the cost over time as the equipment is used. That’s the depreciation to which Burry refers.
- Tech companies have argued that their chips effectively get a second life by being repurposed from training to inference, which is intended to coincide with when new flagship models are introduced and put toward the rigors of training. Is that in fact the case? We’re going to find out.
|
Company-specific reports from industry bellwethers would suggest older chips are still very much in demand; Nebius, CoreWeave, and Oracle’s businesses all seem to be able to get more of a second life out of those older chips. Still, just because A100s have been able to stand the test of time doesn’t mean future generations of chips will. Recall, for instance, how Nvidia’s Blackwell ramp was delayed because of overheating issues. |
|
|
The proof, ultimately, will be in the cash flows over time — or a lack thereof — and how the answers to these questions play out. Are consumers and businesses willing to pay for a non-flagship level of AI compute for certain tasks? Early evidence suggests yes. Are chips physically able to hold up to their workloads for a five-plus-year period? Early evidence also hints at yes. Do changes in which tasks GPUs are being asked to perform radically alter the overall ROI on all this spending? It’s too early to tell. |
|
|
Turn Market Moods Into Market Moves. |
Everyone’s talking. BUZZ is tracking. Sentiment is a distinct factor that moves the market — but can be misleading without a way to measure it. The VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) offers investors just that: a rules-based way to harness crowd conviction. The fund tracks the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders IndexTM, a methodology that selects and weights 75 large-cap US stocks by sentiment. That’s achieved by AI and natural language processing to scan finance-specific language across online content, then aggregated into investable insight. Because it’s sentiment-driven, the index is rebalanced monthly to capture shifts in discourse. BUZZ naturally picks up on themes as they emerge, from AI adopters to crypto-treasury plays. Discover how BUZZ can add a behavioral lens to your portfolio to reflect the market’s mood. |
|
|
Tesla shareholders voted resoundingly in favor of CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package last week, with nearly 70% voting in favor. Their enthusiasm for investment in Musk’s other company was much more muted, however, as 38% voted in favor, 33% voted against, and a notable 17% of shareholders abstained from voting, recent filings show. The shareholder proposal had argued that xAI’s AI expertise would complement Tesla’s autonomous driving and robotics endeavors, and would give Tesla investors a stake “in a major AI player, potentially yielding significant financial returns while fostering technological advancements that benefit Tesla’s customers and shareholders.” |
- Tesla’s bylaws “generally consider abstention as votes against,” so the measure failed to win approval. Tesla’s board itself abstained from making a recommendation on the xAI proposal to avoid “related party” conflicts, as Musk is the head of both companies.
- Tesla Board Chair Robyn Denholm recently told The Wall Street Journal that the board “hadn’t previously looked into xAI’s financials or done any of the due diligence required to make an investment.”
- Musk can’t make his public company, Tesla, invest in his other, private companies. In July, he posted, “It’s not up to me. If it was up to me, Tesla would have invested in xAI long ago.”
- Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jones said the vote was a missed opportunity. “We don’t think investors understand just how important xAI is to Tesla and the broader Muskonomy,” he wrote in a note. “Tesla’s relationship with xAI (financially and strategically) is deterministic to the long-term success of Tesla due in part to the natural synergies of data, software, hardware and manufacturing in recursive loops.”
|
To put that last quote plainly: Tesla continues to pitch itself not as a car company, but as the center of our autonomous future, and AI — especially developed in-house by Musk — is key to that plan. |
| |
The utopian future Elon Musk has described on earnings calls is awe-inspiring. And if Optimus robots can “actually eliminate poverty,” as Musk said during the shareholder meeting, that would be pretty amazing. But as things stand, there’s still widespread doubt that Tesla will even roll out full self-driving tech this year. Perhaps with his new pay package, he’ll be more focused on achieving those major milestones and spend more time at Tesla, though that’s not guaranteed. |
|
|
As we turn in to the final lap of Q3 earnings season, natural gas stocks have emerged as some of the most overlooked sources of revenue growth for investors, according to a screen we recently ran using FactSet data. |
|
|
Level up your trading with index options |
|
|
- 🥊 MMA: This Saturday is UFC 322, where Jack Della Maddalena will face Islam Makhachev at the main event in Madison Square Garden. The market has Makhachev as the strong favorite, at 71%.
- 🎵 Music: Will an AI-generated song make the Billboard Hot 100 this year? Chances seem low, with the market pricing just a 16% chance of that happening before 2026.
- 🎮 Game of the Year: Heading into the final months of the year and the last couple of major releases, the outright front-runner for the Game of the Year award for 2025 is “Clair Obscur: Expedition 33,” for which the market is pricing around an 81% chance of being tapped for the top video game. The nearest runner-up, “Hollow Knight: Silksong,” is vastly behind it.
|
*Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC. |
|
|
- Earnings expected from On Holding and Cisco
|
|
|
VanEck Advertising Disclosures:
This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities, financial instruments or digital assets mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, tax advice, or any call to action. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward-looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are for illustrative purposes only, are valid as of the date of this communication, and are subject to change without notice. Actual future performance of any assets or industries mentioned is unknown. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. VanEck does not guarantee the accuracy of third-party data. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck or its other employees. An investment in the Fund may be subject to risks which include, among others, risks related to social media analytics, equity securities, medium-capitalization companies, information technology sector, communication services sector, consumer discretionary sector, financials sector, market, operational, high portfolio turnover, index tracking, authorized participant concentration, no guarantee of active trading market, trading issues, passive management, fund shares trading, premium/discount and liquidity of fund shares and index-related concentration risks, all of which may adversely affect the Fund. Medium-capitalization companies may be subject to elevated risks. Investing in companies based on social media analytics involves the potential risk of market manipulation because social media posts may be made with an intent to inflate, or otherwise manipulate, the public perception of a company stock or other investment. Although the Sentiment Leaders Index provider attempts to mitigate the potential risk of such manipulation by employing screens to identify posts which may be computer generated or deceptive and by employing market capitalization and trading volume criteria to remove companies which may be more likely targets for such manipulation, there is no guarantee that the Sentiment Leaders Index's model will successfully reduce such risk. Furthermore, text and sentiment analysis of social media postings may prove inaccurate in predicting a company's stock performance. Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus , which contains this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com/etfs. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing. BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index (the “BUZZ Index”) is a product of BUZZ HOLDINGS ULC (“BUZZ Holdings”), and has been Licensed to Van Eck Corporation for use in connection with the VanEck Social Sentiment ETF. “BUZZ” is a trademark of BUZZ Holdings, which have been licensed by Van Eck Associates Corporation for use in connection with the BUZZ Index. VanEck Social Sentiment ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by BUZZ Holdings or its shareholders, including Periscope Capital Inc., or the licensor of the BUZZ Index, and/or their respective affiliates and third party licensors. BUZZ Holdings makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, to the owners of the VanEck Social Sentiment ETF or any member of the public regarding the advisability of investing in securities generally or in VanEck Social Sentiment ETF, particularly or the ability of the BUZZ Index to track general market performance. Licensor’s only relationship to the Licensee is the licensing of the Index which is determined and composed by Licensor without regard to Licensee or the Product(s). Licensor has no obligation to take the needs of the Licensee or the owners of the Product(s) into consideration in determining or composing the Index. Licensor shall not be liable to any person for any error in the Index nor shall it be under any obligation to advise any person of any error therein. BUZZ Holdings is not an investment advisor and the inclusion of a security in the BUZZ Index is not a recommendation by BUZZ Holdings to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor should it be considered investment advice. “BUZZ” is a trademark of BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index and is used under License. © Van Eck Securities Corporation, Distributor, a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Eck Associates Corporation. |
Was this email forwarded to you? Don’t miss out on future stories — subscribe to Snacks and get your daily dose of financial news straight to your inbox. Craving more insights in your inbox? Subscribe to Chartr and The Wrap for quality reads. |
|
|
Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate... See more |
|
|
SHERWOOD MEDIA, LLC, 85 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 |
|
|
|
